Fascination About h335 load data 223

I ordinarily deliver 100rds of 26gr TAC underneath Nosler 55grBT's with me for when Now we have a phase in which we will probably be shooting smaller targets at 100yds or more.

All Having said that, should you be employing H335 for deer searching the powder fouling won't be a major issue. The temperature sensitivity may be, depending on the range of temps you sometimes hunt in.

During the accompanying data only a few loads exceeded a fifty-grain charge fat, and have been mostly loaded at the side of

As indicated, You will find a massive number of best-notch extruded and spherical powders that were designed mainly to the .308/7.sixty two NATO cartridges. Some are designed for match-successful overall performance, Other people Together with the hunter in mind, while select spherical powders were created for overcome in semiautomatic and automatic rifles but also serve very well in sporting apps.

Having said that, I have personally Never had any of the problems Many others have having a Hornady AP. I'm guessing that tolerance is The important thing to creating any press prosperous.

2gr if I am not mistaken. Anyway I love how speedily I used to be able to load up these a hundred rounds on my single phase. Queries...what powder do you like for loading in this process?  CFE metered incredibly properly.  Is BLC(2) a far better powder though? I hear they both meter properly Also, I'm thinkin of doing a 100 spherical run of 55gr sp for personal defense ammo in place of paying out $1 spherical for federal fusion ammo I currently load my High definition ar with.  For this Particular ammo, should I just set in enough time to weigh Every cost? Thanks men

Quoted: Ok h335 vs cfe223 happy I questioned.  The CFE posts excellent groups And that i already have it determined so I am going to roll with it.

You'll obtain an electronic mail each Friday morning that includes the latest chatter from the hottest matters, breaking news encompassing legislation, as well as exceptional offers only accessible to ARFCOM email subscribers.

Many thanks Dryflash! This thread has my curiosity peaked a little concerning how the Wolf 55gr bullets will do with TAC. I might have to try to do the job up a load and see how they are doing.

Have always listened to that 335 metered good. Do TAC and Benchmark behave equally as very well from the powder thrower? For your history I just bought a pound of Benchmark but it had been a simple choice, only 223 suited powder I could find community.

All I'm concerned with is basic safety, I don't desire to blow up the rifle or result in unnecessary dress in from extreme pressures. I will acknowledge I nonetheless Do not completely get how a similar demand in both situations will cause different pressures, Specifically right after resizing and trimming but I'm thoroughly new to this.

Add to estimate Only show this user #fifteen · Sep 8, 2016 I remember a newer means of chasing ocw was loading yet another past max. If you do not have any tension spikes, then it was prompt to go one more action to determine if you can find extra velocity for prolonged variety concentrating on.

2 grains rather than exceed 3100 fps. The results posted inside the handbook for a longer barrel do yield bigger values, but it would appear that the worth from the NATO ammunition in that barrel would produce even larger values.

I’ve read great points about tac nevertheless. I’ve read through it’s better for lighter bullets? What’s your dude’s load data for tac plus the 55gr’er. Thanks and sorry, I come to feel like I article a great deal lol You will be MY ONLY FRIENDS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *